Publication Ethics
Taylorian Insights: Journal of Management Review (Taylorian) is fully committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in scholarly publishing. This publication ethics policy is based on the best practice guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and aims to ensure the integrity and quality of the works published. All parties involved in the publication process – Authors, Editors, and Reviewers – are expected to adhere to the following ethical principles.
- Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that the submitted manuscript is their original work and free from any form of plagiarism. Any use of the work and/or words of others must be properly cited.
- Redundant/Concurrent Publication: Authors should not submit the same manuscript or a manuscript with substantially similar content concurrently to more than one journal.
- Authorship: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported research.
- Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors must disclose any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript.
- Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Authors are fully responsible for the entire content of the manuscript, including parts that may have been assisted by AI, and its use must be transparently disclosed.
- Fundamental Errors in Published Works: When an author discovers a significant error in their own published work, it is their obligation to promptly notify the journal editor and cooperate to retract or correct the manuscript.
- Publication Decisions: The Editors are responsible for deciding which articles should be published based on the manuscript's academic quality, relevance, originality, and contribution.
- Fair Play: Editors must evaluate manuscripts without regard to the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
- Confidentiality: Editors and editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, and potential reviewers.
- Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Editors must not use unpublished materials for their own research without the express written consent of the authors.
- Peer Review Process: Editors must ensure that a fair, objective, and double-blind peer review process is conducted for every manuscript.
- Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and may also assist the author in improving the manuscript.
- Promptness: Any reviewer who feels unqualified or knows that a prompt review is impossible should notify the editor and excuse themselves from the review process.
- Confidentiality: Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents.
- Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
- Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
- Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Violations & Retraction
Proven ethics violations will be handled following COPE guidelines, which may include rejection, retraction, and notification to authors' institutions.
Archiving
We use LOCKSS, CLOCKSS, and national repositories like Garuda to ensure perpetual accessibility of our content.
Financial Arrangements
An APC of IDR 200,000 (approx. $12 USD) is implemented. Details are in the "Author Guidelines" section.